It is likely that several states in the US will issue stimulus checks and guarantee a universal basic income (UBI) for citizens from July 2024. These measures are primarily aimed at alleviating poverty and providing financial assistance to low-income families and individuals.

Several programs are being implemented in several California counties and New York cities to meet the needs of the population. Now let’s focus on the stimulus payments and guaranteed income policies which will benefit thousands of people in the coming month.

$1,000 stimulus checks and guaranteed basic income

Guaranteed Basic Income (GBI) has been rolled out in more than 50 US Cities Since 2019 because of its proven benefits. Ideally, these programs offer monthly stipends ranging from $100 to $1,000 to specific low-income individuals, without any obligation.

GBI represents a more public approach to poverty and economic inequality. These programs aim to provide various financial benefits without any restrictions on their purpose and frequency.providing recipients with a safety net against fluctuating income sources and enabling them to meet other essential needs.

This approach differs from most social welfare programs, which often come with numerous conditions and restrictions on the use of benefits. According to GBI advocates, such support improves health care, education and the overall quality of life for participants.

Discover specific incentive programs in your state

Some US cities offering incentive payments include, but are not limited to, those in Californiawhere several cities have introduced payments. For example, “Breathe” is a recently launched program in Los Angeles offering $1,000 monthly through August 2025 for 1,000 low-income households. Mountain View City and Long Beach also have plans to pay certain groups $500 per month.

In Georgia the Georgia Resilience and Opportunity Fund Pays $850 Monthly Directly to Low-Income Black Women. Illinois’ Cook County Promise program provides $500 per month to 3,250 middle-income households. Other states with specific city programs include Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, New Mexico, New York and Texas, each of which offers monthly payments to eligible individuals, such as young parents, entrepreneurs or low-income mothers.

These diverse programs reflect a growing recognition of the need for tailored development solutions in diverse locations. All of these efforts are designed to address community-specific problems better than standardized federal programs, which may not be as effective at addressing local needs.

Admission criteria and targeted support for different groups

It is also important to note that many programs are designed for specific individuals or under certain circumstancesIn Flint, Michigan, for example, the “Rx Kids” program offers a one-time $1,500 gift card to new and expectant mothers. In Santa Fe, New Mexico, the target population is low-income, community college freshmen with young parental responsibilities.

In Pennsylvania, adjustments have been made to the Property Tax and Rent Refund Program for Seniors and Persons with Disabilitieswith rewards awarded based on income and in extreme cases can reach $1,000. Minnesota recently announced the launch of its electric bike discount program in July of this year, aimed at promoting sustainable transportation by offering discounts, with higher amounts for low-income earners.

These targeted approaches increase the ability to direct resources to those who will benefit most. As highlighted, these programs are aimed at improving equity and efficiency in supporting aspects of life where different groups face unique challenges, such as the costs of raising a child or transportation needs for seniors.

How to prepare for the stimulus payments coming in July 2024

Finally, as we approach July 2024, it is critical to pay attention to examples of stimulus payments and guaranteed income programs across America and other initiatives aimed at supporting people in need. Programs such as California’s comprehensive city initiatives and Pennsylvania’s simple tax credit provisions for seniors are examples of state-level programs.

These measures indicate a growing awareness of the need to expand more positive economic support initiatives. Although the details may vary depending on the circumstancesThe general trend suggests additional, on-demand, individualized support tailored to the specific needs of recipients. Therefore, as these programs continue and expand, they can provide valuable insights into eliminating poverty and stabilizing the economy in the United States.

How are these programs coordinated with existing social security systems at the federal level in the United States?

There is limited coordination between the different social welfare programs at federal level in the United StatesKey points to consider:

• The US social security system is complex, spread across 13 categories of managed programs by 8 different federal agencies. Each program has its own unique qualification rules and definition of low income.
• There is not a single “Ministry of Welfare” in the federal government that oversees all programs in a coordinated manner. Instead, responsibilities are divided among agencies such as HHS, USDA, HUD, SSA, Dept of Education, Dept of Labor, and the IRS.
• This structure that has developed over the past 70+ years. Programs were added one by one by Congress, with no attempt to coordinate them into a coherent system. The system lacks consistent goals and eligibility criteria.
• As a result, Poor Americans must use each program separately to see if they qualify and are entitled to benefits. This can be very difficult. There is little coordination between programs.
• Historically, social security in the United States developed through both government and non-government efforts. It was pragmatic and responsive to need, not based on a unified ideology.
• The federal government implemented major expansions of social services in the 1930s in response to the Great Depression. That happened again in the 1960s with the War on Poverty and Great Society initiatives. In the 1990s, welfare reform was implemented. It gave states more control but imposed stricter limits and work requirements on recipients.